<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Lowyat.NET: Latest topics by mixhali</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:23:23 +0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Time 100MB Most suckers aren&amp;#39;t getting their speed</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/0</link>
            <description></description>
            <category>Networks and Broadband</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 07:30:00 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Time 100MB Most suckers aren&amp;#39;t getting their speed</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3139474</link>
            <description>HI all, I recently got connected with time on the 100mb plan. when i started doing some speed tests i was surprised to find the best i could get was about 40mb. After some playing around i realized that the cisco modem they provided simply was not capable of routing at those speeds. When I connect my pc directly to the huawei Gpon and create a pppoe connection i get over 100mb. so clearly the cisco is not up to it. So why do they supply it? Joke. 90% of customers are probably not as inquisitive as me and they are not getting what they paid for. Where is consumer affairs in this country??. I managed to get into the huawei gpon and noticed it is possible to establish a ppoe connection from there. So why don&amp;#39;t they do that? Well maybe cause they can&amp;#39;t, at least i couldn&amp;#39;t figure it out. Has anyone achieved this? The huawei as 4 1gb lag ports so it makes sense to terminate the PPP connection here rather than at the cisco router. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyhow I have tried a few routers and none are capable of passing the 100mb+ speed through except one I borrowed from work, a Cisco 1941 which has 2 gbe interfaces. That did the trick&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A</description>
            <author>mixhali</author>
            <category>Networks and Broadband</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:58:08 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Replacing Unifi Hardware, All of it&amp;#33;</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/0</link>
            <description></description>
            <category>Networks and Broadband</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 07:30:00 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Replacing Unifi Hardware, All of it&amp;#33;</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2921964</link>
            <description>Hi guys. I live in a high rise and have been provided the ZTE DSL box as well as the standard crappy Dink router. I have swapped out the Dlink box with a spare cisco 871 I had laying around. I have been recently thinking about swapping out the ZTE also. I have a few Cisco 877 ADSL ISR laying around and it got me thinking could I replace the ZTE box also. Not that I have an issue with it simply because it is one less thing to plug in. The config running on the ZTE looks to have a few PPP connections running on it  along with some VLAN designations. Has anyone attempted to do this? If so I would be interested in the config to save me some time. Otherwise I will have a go at it my self and post results. By the way I am aware that doing this will cost me the voip phone but I don&amp;#39;t use this anyway.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way let me know anyone interested in 871. I have config for data and am working on IPTV also&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;</description>
            <author>mixhali</author>
            <category>Networks and Broadband</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:31:53 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
