<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Lowyat.NET: Latest topics by int19h</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 06:35:48 +0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Asterisk the GaulxxxxPABX</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/277826</link>
            <description>Hi all,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just wondering if anyone here uses Asterisk on a day-to-day basis for any reason... from a SOHO PABX system to an enterprise VoIP gateway to a personal answering machine... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I used to use it as a VoIP link / Telekom gateway. Left a FreeBSD boxen sitting at home in KL with an FXO port to a Telekom line, and used to make calls from overseas thru SIP/IAX. But alas, the boxen was old and went MIA months ago, lol... I suspect the HDD died (it was problematic even way back then), it&amp;#39;s not responding to ping etc. Noone at home with the skillxorz to troubleshoot it (though I had my mom do a hard restart a few times). Oh well. Back to purchasing calling cards  &lt;!--emo&amp;:)--&gt;&lt;img src='http://static.lowyat.net/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /&gt;&lt;!--endemo--&gt;</description>
            <author>int19h</author>
            <category>Linux &amp;amp; Open Source Software</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:53:23 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Question about GNU GPL</title>
            <link>http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/163454</link>
            <description>Hypothetical scenario... I&amp;#39;m under contract to company X. I&amp;#39;m asked to extend software Y (which is released under the GNU GPL license) and my extensions (Z) derives from sources of Y, i.e. I use source code from Y as a starting point. My extension in the end takes the form of a handful of patch files (i.e. diffs) and 2 standalone source files. MUST the extension Z therefore also be released under the GNU GPL license? Can X choose to distribute the 2 standalone .o files purely in binary form? The code contained within the 2 standalone files is not derived from any GNU GPL sources.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, assuming that the GNU GPL does apply to the entire code base of the extension that I produced (Z), do I have the right to distribute the sources? My understanding is that the GPL only obligates that the sources of Z accompany the binaries of Z, so X only has to give Z sources to customers who receive the Z extension. However do I, who produced Z while under contract to X, have the right to distribute the sources any way I like? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An extreme example... lets say I&amp;#39;m working for someone else now, can I bring the sources for Z into the new company for use in their products? The issue here is whether I have the right to distribute GNU GPL source code which I produced under contract to X.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would appreciate any comments anyone has on this issue, thanks&amp;#33;</description>
            <author>int19h</author>
            <category>Linux &amp;amp; Open Source Software</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:10:04 +0800</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
